A Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court judge raised questions about the use of AI when confronted with an error-filled brief.

Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean for the law, for lawyers and lower courts, and for people’s lives. Please ...

Accepting an argument from a law professor that no party to the case had made, the Supreme Court handed the Trump ...

April 24 (Reuters) - When the U.S. Supreme Court next week hears arguments in a case that could reshape class action litigation, the justices will consider some lofty questions about constitutional ...

Supreme Court lawyer Deepak Gupta joins Supreme Court Brief to discuss his fight against President Donald Trump's firings of independent federal regulators. Welcome to this podcast edition of Supreme ...

It’s the age-old question: Does the Supreme Court decide its cases based on rank partisanship rather than legal principles? Of course, this raises the obvious follow-up: Which cases are the important ...

When the Supreme Court returns to the bench next week for the first argument of 2026, in Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, it will confront a thorny dispute […] The post Court to hear ...

June 23 (Reuters) - When the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this year agreed to take up medical testing company Laboratory Corporation of America’s appeal of a class certification order, it was one of the ...

There are two distinct legal questions before the U.S. Supreme Court as it hears arguments this week in a major case over a religious charter school in Oklahoma. Both are infused with deep ideological ...

Welcome to this podcast edition of Supreme Court Brief, a weekly feature from Law.com where I break down the latest news from the nation's most powerful court and interview an expert guest. On today's ...