Within the same week, two judges in the Northern District of California issued groundbreaking summary judgment rulings regarding whether an artificial intelligence company’s scraping and ingestion of ...
Judge Alsup’s summary judgement order in Bartz v Anthropic PBC 1 released June 23, 2025 is making waves in the copyright and AI world. The order, issued out of the United States District Court for the ...
This is the first time a judge found that an AI company's use of copyrighted material is fair use. Katelyn is a writer with CNET covering artificial intelligence, including chatbots, image and video ...
“Applying the fair use doctrine to generative AI presents novel and complex challenges that stretch the boundaries of traditional copyright analysis.” The advent of generative AI brings to the ...
"Rather than walking through the four-factor fair use analysis for each case, this column will discuss two significant caveats that these decisions have added to the ongoing debate in the courts about ...
Hosted on MSN
The 'Kadrey v. Meta' fair use ruling is just the start of a long, complex AI copyright battle
On Wednesday, the judge in the landmark AI copyright case Kadrey, et al. v. Meta Platforms Inc. ruled in Meta’s favor. And U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria seemed to do so reluctantly, calling his ...
Should tech companies have free access to copyrighted books and articles for training their AI models? Two judges recently nudged us toward an answer. More than 40 lawsuits have been filed against AI ...
For a regularly updated case tracker covering intellectual property and privacy-related lawsuits concerning GenAI (including more decisions addressing fair use), see Generative AI: Federal Litigation ...
Cameron D. Miller, PhD, is Associate Professor of Management at Syracuse University's Whitman School of Management and Fellow at the Institute for an Entrepreneurial Society. He is co-author of The ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results